We have said more than once that faith is an acceptant response to what God has said and done. Since God has said a lot about what he expects of us, including many explicit commands, it is obvious that obedience plays a central role in Christian faith. Is that not what you would expect since Christ is both Lord of lords and King of kings?
After we trust in Jesus, we still have a lifetime of choices to make about how best to obey our Lord. How will we proceed?
Romans 5:18-19 Therefore, as one trespass led to condemnation for all men, so one act of righteousness leads to justification and life for all men. 19 For as by the one man’s disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man’s obedience the many will be made righteous.
The parallelism built into Romans 5:18 is pervasive, as shown below:
as one trespass [led to] condemnation for all men, } Adam
so one act of righteousness [leads to] justification and life for all men. } Christ
The square brackets [ ] indicate that the verb has been supplied to make literary English because the Greek sentence has no verbs. Different English translations have supplied different verbs:
NET (came), NLT (brings), HCSB (is), and NASB (resulted). Each of these choices is reasonable.
By dissecting 5:18 in this way, we can easily spot important points. First, each single act affected all men, a comprehensive expression. As to the scope of all, C.E.B. Cranfield says:
It will be wise to take it thoroughly seriously as really meaning all, to understand the implication to be that what Christ has done he has really done for all men, that [life-giving justification HCSB] is truly offered to all, and all are to be summoned urgently to accept the proffered gift, but at the same time to allow that this clause does not foreclose the question whether in the end all will actually come to share it.
Of course, we have already discussed the gift-nature of the justification and life. The gift was explicitly mentioned three times in Rom. 5:15-17. Not all accept the gift by faith.
Using the interpretive principles of salvation history (see Introduction), we point out that Adams deed came first, to the undoing of humanitys privileged position in Eden and much more. The act of Christ came later and contained such grace as to overwhelm the damage done by Adam. James Dunn says: The inaugurating act of the new epoch [i.e. the Age To Come] is thus presented as a counter to and cancellation of the inaugurating act of the old [i.e. The Present Age], Christs right turn undoing Adams wrong turn. Wrong turn is just another term for disobedience.
(ESV) Romans 5:19 For as by the one man’s disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man’s obedience the many will be made righteous.
Once again, Romans 5:19 has strong parallelism, but this time with actual Greek verbs:
as by the one mans disobedience the many were made sinners, } Adam
so by the one mans obedience the many will be made righteous. } Christ
It is clear from the parallelism that the major difference between what Adam did and what Jesus did is the difference between disobedience by Adam and obedience by Christ.
Sin wears many masks in life and in Romans, and Paul used a variety of terms to refer to it. In 5:12 we have the Greek noun hamartia meaning a departure from either human or divine standards of uprightness . . . sin. In 5:15, 17, and 18 he switched to parapt?ma meaning a violation of moral standards, offense, wrongdoing, sin. Here in 5:19 Paul switched to parakoemeaning refusal to listen and so be disobedient, unwillingness to hear, disobedience.
We could say that hamartia means violating a revealed standard of God. The term parapt?ma is used figuratively of making a false step; think of hitting your bare toes against a chair leg and put that pain in the context of a false step in some moral situation. The word in 5:19 gives us the interesting insight that Adam failed to listen to Gods actual voice! God told him explicitly what must not be done (Gen. 2:17), and he did it anyway. Unfortunately, many people can identify!
Cranfield makes one clarification about 5:19 when he says, The many have not been condemned for someone elses transgression, for Adams sin, but because, as a result of Adams transgression, they have themselves been sinners.
But the good news outshines the bad news by far: Jesus obeyed to bring righteousness to all who put their faith in him! The author of Hebrews says about Jesus: Although he was a son, he learned obedience through the things he suffered. And by being perfected in this way, he became the source of eternal salvation to all who obey him (Heb. 5:8-9, NET).
Surely it is plain that to follow Jesus means we are obedient to the Father just as he was. As the old hymn says, Theres no other way to be happy in Jesus but to trust and obey. When you think about it, trusting and obeying are very similar because trusting is faith and obeying is faithfulness.
1. How many of us have heard Gods voice about something, but, like Adam, we come to a point at which we do not listen? When have you made that error, and what did you learn from it? 2. What do you consider a difficult thing about obedience? How do you get around that obstacle?
It is no accident that Paul begins the letter to the Romans with the phrase obedience of faith (1:5) and ends the letter with the same phrase (16:26). There is no such thing as faith without obedience!
Copyright 2012 Barry Applewhite, Plano, Texas. All rights reserved worldwide. Derived from materials created for Christ Fellowship, McKinney, Texas. Used by permission.
 C.E.B. Cranfield, The Epistle to the Romans, The International Critical Commentary (Edinburgh: T.&T. Clark Limited, 1975) 290.
 James D.G. Dunn, Romans 1-8, Word Biblical Commentary (Dallas: Word Books, 1988) 297.
 BDAG-3, hamartia, sin, q.v.
 BDAG-3, parapt?ma, offense, q.v.
 BDAG-3, parako?s, unwillingness to hear, q.v.
 Cranfield, Romans, 290.